Instrumententafel Angst & Gier Bergbaubecken Geldbörsen Wörterbuch Werben Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Marktkapitalisierung:
24h Vol:
Kryptowährungen: 13102
Märkte: 101106
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
A company that is changing the way the world mines bitcoin

WallStreet Forex Robot 3.0
Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
13102
Kryptowährungen
60.43%
Bitcoin Aktie
Coinpaper 2025-03-05 16:46:33

Bybit vs ParaSwap DAO: dispute over commission refunds from hacker transactions

Bybit vs ParaSwap DAO: dispute over commission refunds from hacker transactions

Following a request from Bybit to return funds that were received during the swaps of stolen ETH by the Lazarus Group, members of the ParaSwap DAO have split into two camps: Some support the return of commissions. Others oppose such an action. On 4 March , a proposal to freeze and return 44,67 wrapped ethereum (wETH), the amount of which nearly reaches $100,000 , was put forward on the ParaSwap DAO forum. At first, such a proposal faced criticism, with several DAO members even calling for a review before making any decision. The next day, 5 March , Bybit representatives posted a thread on their official X (Twitter) account, confirming that they were the ones who sent the offer to return the stolen funds. DAO members then began discussing possible solutions, with many wondering about the future implications of a potential commission refund. Onchain detective and DeFi expert Ignas , who is the DAO's ParaSwap delegate, wrote a thread on his official X (Twitter) account, emphasising the dilemma facing the community. He also noted that taking profits from the hack puts DAO in a bad light and that returning them would create a more loyal community attitude, as well as show support for another industry player. Whereas keeping the funds could entail multiple regulatory scrutiny, headaches and criticism from the cryptocommunity. Despite this, Ignace sees this as a dangerous distinction: ”Code is law. DAO earned these commissions legitimately by providing smart contract services. In case the funds are recovered now, how to proceed in the future? This is a dangerous precedent for all of DeFi.” The ParaSwap DAO delegate also noted that such a development could also have implications for ThorSwap , which the hackers used to swap ETH into various assets. Nearly a week after the hack, by 27 February , the total volume of swaps within THORChain exceeded $1 billion , as hackers used the site as a primary tool for laundering stolen funds. And by 4 March , the platform had generated around $5 million in commissions , while the total reached $5.4 billion . If Bybit files a similar refund request from THORChain, the exchange could recover significantly more funds. Members of the SEED Gov DAO shared three possible outcomes: Return of the full amount of funds requested. Complete refusal of the exchange's request. Arrangement for a structured return that will include retention of 10% of the funds as consideration . Since the opinion of ParaSwap DAO members, a heated debate broke out on the forum. Some stated that the funds should be returned. Others said they could organise a structured return of the funds if they kept 10% as a consideration and ensured that any future liabilities for the DAO were eliminated. Some strongly opposed, stating that if the ParaSwap DAO returned funds to Bybit, it would ” damage its reputation ”. One DAO member gave an example of a similar situation that happened back in 2013 , a protocol asked ParaSwap to refund commissions after hackers used it to launder funds. He emphasised that the decision was made then not to return the funds, adding that ” there is no reason to make a different decision this time ”.

Meist gelesene Nachrichten



Cryptohopper
Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
60.43%
Bitcoin Aktie
150
Heute Nachrichten
Lesen Sie den Haftungsausschluss : Alle hierin bereitgestellten Inhalte unserer Website, Hyperlinks, zugehörige Anwendungen, Foren, Blogs, Social-Media-Konten und andere Plattformen („Website“) dienen ausschließlich Ihrer allgemeinen Information und werden aus Quellen Dritter bezogen. Wir geben keinerlei Garantien in Bezug auf unseren Inhalt, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Genauigkeit und Aktualität. Kein Teil der Inhalte, die wir zur Verfügung stellen, stellt Finanzberatung, Rechtsberatung oder eine andere Form der Beratung dar, die für Ihr spezifisches Vertrauen zu irgendeinem Zweck bestimmt ist. Die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen in unsere Inhalte erfolgt ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko und Ermessen. Sie sollten Ihre eigenen Untersuchungen durchführen, unsere Inhalte prüfen, analysieren und überprüfen, bevor Sie sich darauf verlassen. Der Handel ist eine sehr riskante Aktivität, die zu erheblichen Verlusten führen kann. Konsultieren Sie daher Ihren Finanzberater, bevor Sie eine Entscheidung treffen. Kein Inhalt unserer Website ist als Aufforderung oder Angebot zu verstehen