Instrumententafel Angst & Gier Bergbaubecken Geldbörsen Wörterbuch Werben Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Marktkapitalisierung:
24h Vol:
Kryptowährungen: 13285
Märkte: 101961
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
America's Social Casino

Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
13285
Kryptowährungen
62.63%
Bitcoin Aktie
coinpedia 2025-05-21 04:04:50

XRP News: Ripple Lawsuit is Not Closed, Former SEC Lawyer Hints ‘Bigger Issue’

XRP News: Ripple Lawsuit is Not Closed, Former SEC Lawyer Hints ‘Bigger Issue’

The post XRP News: Ripple Lawsuit is Not Closed, Former SEC Lawyer Hints ‘Bigger Issue’ appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News There’s been a lot of chatter online lately about the status of the long-running legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). While some legal experts following the case closely believe it might take a few more months before a final verdict is reached, misleading claims and rumours continue to spread on social media. Recently, a user named Altcoin Bale posted on X, claiming that the case was already closed, banks were quietly buying XRP, and retail investors would soon be priced out. But this statement didn’t sit well with pro-XRP attorney Bill Morgan, who has been actively tracking the lawsuit. Bill quickly responded, saying, “FFS the case is not closed, or did you miss the news last week about an unsuccessful motion for an indicative ruling and an Appeal and Cross-appeal in abeyance but not over.” Another user replied to Bill, saying that the case had hit a procedural snag because both Ripple and the SEC submitted a dismissal request using the wrong form. According to them, this technical error led the judge to reject it. FFS the case is not closed, or did you miss the news last week about an unsuccessful motion for an indicative ruling and an Appeal and Cross-appeal in abeyance but not over — bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) May 19, 2025 However, former SEC lawyer Marc Fagel stepped in, clarifying that the situation was far more serious than just a simple paperwork issue. “That is not an accurate description at all. It’s a far bigger issue than that,” he commented. Bill Morgan, expressing his frustration, remarked, “The XRP community don’t want to listen. They want to hear ‘case closed, XRP to the moon.’” For the unversed, here’s what actually happened: Judge Analisa Torres denied both parties’ motions for an indicative ruling. In simple terms, the judge stated that if the court’s jurisdiction were restored, she would deny the motion as it was filed under the wrong procedural rule. This means Ripple and the SEC will likely have to refile the motion correctly, and possibly plead their case once again. While XRP supporters are eagerly awaiting good news, it’s clear from the legal experts’ comments that the lawsuit is still ongoing — and there are a few more legal hurdles to clear before any final outcome.

Meist gelesene Nachrichten

Moralis Money
Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
62.63%
Bitcoin Aktie
625
Heute Nachrichten
Lesen Sie den Haftungsausschluss : Alle hierin bereitgestellten Inhalte unserer Website, Hyperlinks, zugehörige Anwendungen, Foren, Blogs, Social-Media-Konten und andere Plattformen („Website“) dienen ausschließlich Ihrer allgemeinen Information und werden aus Quellen Dritter bezogen. Wir geben keinerlei Garantien in Bezug auf unseren Inhalt, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Genauigkeit und Aktualität. Kein Teil der Inhalte, die wir zur Verfügung stellen, stellt Finanzberatung, Rechtsberatung oder eine andere Form der Beratung dar, die für Ihr spezifisches Vertrauen zu irgendeinem Zweck bestimmt ist. Die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen in unsere Inhalte erfolgt ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko und Ermessen. Sie sollten Ihre eigenen Untersuchungen durchführen, unsere Inhalte prüfen, analysieren und überprüfen, bevor Sie sich darauf verlassen. Der Handel ist eine sehr riskante Aktivität, die zu erheblichen Verlusten führen kann. Konsultieren Sie daher Ihren Finanzberater, bevor Sie eine Entscheidung treffen. Kein Inhalt unserer Website ist als Aufforderung oder Angebot zu verstehen