Instrumententafel Angst & Gier Bergbaubecken Geldbörsen Wörterbuch Werben Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Marktkapitalisierung:
24h Vol:
Kryptowährungen: 13286
Märkte: 103713
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
America's Social Casino

Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
13286
Kryptowährungen
63.64%
Bitcoin Aktie
Finbold 2025-06-02 12:43:47

Legal expert blasts ’biggest XRP lie’ of the year

Legal expert blasts ’biggest XRP lie’ of the year

Lawyer Bill Morgan has called out what he described as the biggest lie regarding XRP’s lack of perceived legal clarity. Morgan, a supporter of Ripple and XRP, was responding to an X user on June 1 who argued that XRP has no legal standing, lacks major institutional support, and plays no role in central bank digital currencies ( CBDCs ). He firmly rejected that claim, citing Judge Analisa Torres’s July 2023 ruling, which determined that XRP, as a digital asset, is not inherently a security. This is a lie. XRP has been found by a judge not itself to be a security. The SEC Appeal did not challenge that finding. To say XRP has no legal clarity is the biggest lie I have seen in crypto this year. https://t.co/6x1AycUxja — bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) June 1, 2025 The ruling made a clear distinction: while Ripple’s institutional sales were deemed securities transactions, programmatic sales on exchanges were not. Although the SEC appealed parts of the decision in October 2024, it notably did not challenge the key finding that XRP is not a security. Morgan argued that this reinforces the view that XRP enjoys a level of judicial clarity that most other cryptocurrencies , like Bitcoin ( BTC ), do not. The case was not about a classification. Judges just decide the issues in the case. The case was about whether sales of XRP by Ripple were securities. Thanks to the Judge’s obiter it has legal clarity of a judge finding that XRP itself is not a security. — bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) June 2, 2025 XRP’s strong legal standing He further emphasized that the judge’s commentary, known as obiter dicta, holds persuasive value in legal circles, giving XRP a stronger position in regulatory debates. “Dicta does provide a degree of legal clarity. It is persuasive authority and there is no finding to the contrary that XRP is a security. Also persuasive is the reasoning that led to the funding that XRP is not a security. It has more judicial clarity than Bitcoin which has none,” he said. Morgan also noted that this precedent offers XRP a more defined legal status than Bitcoin, which lacks a similar court ruling. For now, the case remains unresolved. Following Ripple’s partial victory, both parties are back in court awaiting settlement approval. The proposed deal would see Ripple pay $75 million of its $125 million fine, potentially forfeiting the remaining $50 million. However, the court rejected the proposed settlement, stating that the joint filing was procedurally flawed and lacked legal justification. Featured image via Shutterstock The post Legal expert blasts ’biggest XRP lie’ of the year appeared first on Finbold .

Meist gelesene Nachrichten

Moralis Money
Marktkapitalisierung
24h Vol
63.64%
Bitcoin Aktie
0
Heute Nachrichten
Lesen Sie den Haftungsausschluss : Alle hierin bereitgestellten Inhalte unserer Website, Hyperlinks, zugehörige Anwendungen, Foren, Blogs, Social-Media-Konten und andere Plattformen („Website“) dienen ausschließlich Ihrer allgemeinen Information und werden aus Quellen Dritter bezogen. Wir geben keinerlei Garantien in Bezug auf unseren Inhalt, einschließlich, aber nicht beschränkt auf Genauigkeit und Aktualität. Kein Teil der Inhalte, die wir zur Verfügung stellen, stellt Finanzberatung, Rechtsberatung oder eine andere Form der Beratung dar, die für Ihr spezifisches Vertrauen zu irgendeinem Zweck bestimmt ist. Die Verwendung oder das Vertrauen in unsere Inhalte erfolgt ausschließlich auf eigenes Risiko und Ermessen. Sie sollten Ihre eigenen Untersuchungen durchführen, unsere Inhalte prüfen, analysieren und überprüfen, bevor Sie sich darauf verlassen. Der Handel ist eine sehr riskante Aktivität, die zu erheblichen Verlusten führen kann. Konsultieren Sie daher Ihren Finanzberater, bevor Sie eine Entscheidung treffen. Kein Inhalt unserer Website ist als Aufforderung oder Angebot zu verstehen