Jesse, a crypto researcher at Apex Crypto Consulting who claims to have dedicated more than 9,000 hours to studying Ripple and the global financial system, has expressed a controversial view about the Ripple vs. SEC lawsuit. In his recent remarks, he claimed that the lawsuit may not be a regulatory dispute but rather a deliberate strategy to suppress the XRP price, for Ripple to strengthen its position in the global payments landscape. According to Jesse, the protracted legal proceedings appear more like a “carefully planned show” than a genuine clash between a company and a regulator. He suggested that Ripple’s strategy has been to maintain a low-profile, low-price environment for XRP. He believes this gives the company the ability to forge partnerships and expand globally without drawing excessive market attention. In his view, Ripple is not just another private crypto company but one with significant ties to influential financial institutions, including central banks and the International Monetary Fund. He stated his belief that Ripple is pursuing a long-term objective of positioning XRP as a global reserve currency, designed to replace outdated cross-border payment mechanisms such as SWIFT. Lawsuit Allegedly Serves Strategic Interests Jesse went on to argue that the lawsuit has played a key role in enabling Ripple to pursue these ambitions quietly. He claimed that Ripple has already entered into hundreds of agreements and non-disclosure arrangements with major financial institutions, which, in his opinion, have a vested interest in keeping the price of XRP low until the company is ready to implement a full-scale rollout of its technology. We are on X, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) June 15, 2025 He also pointed to historical patterns, noting that individuals or entities that have tried to challenge the existing monetary order have often faced strong opposition. Yet Ripple continues to expand without significant obstacles from global authorities, which he takes as evidence that the company is aligned with powerful players in the financial sector rather than working against them. Jesse was clear, however, that his statements reflect his conclusions from years of research and are not definitive proof of intent. Current Status of the Ripple vs. SEC Case While debates about the motivations behind the lawsuit continue, the legal case itself is nearing its conclusion. The two parties are now awaiting a final ruling on penalties and other unresolved matters. Recently, Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse announced that the company would drop its cross-appeal, a move intended to expedite the resolution of the litigation. Jesse’s comments have added another layer of perspective to the ongoing discussion surrounding Ripple, XRP, and the broader implications of the case. His suggestion that the lawsuit has been used strategically to keep XRP undervalued while Ripple establishes a foundation for a new global payments infrastructure remains his interpretation. Nonetheless, his analysis underscores the complexity of the situation and the theories that continue to surround one of the most closely watched legal battles in the crypto space. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are advised to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on X , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post 9000-Hour XRP Researcher Links SEC vs Ripple Case to XRP Price Suppression appeared first on Times Tabloid .
