CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
America's Social Casino

cryptonews 2025-07-04 08:29:19

Zelenskyy’s NATO Outfit Spurs $79M Betting Dispute on Polymarket

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy’s attire at the June 24 NATO meeting in the Netherlands has ignited a battle among bettors on crypto prediction platform Polymarket . Key Takeaways: Zelenskyy’s NATO outfit sparked a $79 million betting dispute on Polymarket over whether it counted as a suit. Opinions are split, with some saying his jacket and pants look formal. However, others argue that casual elements disqualify it. The market, which has attracted nearly $79 million in bets , wagered on whether he would don a suit before July. The market’s outcome initially settled on “yes,” but has since faced two disputes and is awaiting a final verdict. Debate Over Whether Zelenskyy’s NATO Outfit Qualifies as a Suit At the heart of the debate is whether Zelenskyy’s outfit, a dark jacket, collared shirt, and long pants, constitutes a formal suit. Supporters argue that the garments match in color and fabric, presenting a cohesive, suit-like appearance. Critics counter that the casual cut, military-style elements, and mismatched trainers disqualify it as a traditional suit. Polymarket Intel, a community-run account on X, classified Zelenskyy’s outfit as a suit, but other voices disagreed. President Zelenskyy in a suit last night pic.twitter.com/Uo3Rhuzkq1 — Polymarket Intel (@PolymarketIntel) June 25, 2025 When asked, ChatGPT labeled the ensemble a military-style field jacket rather than a suit. Prominent menswear commentator Derek Guy added fuel to the fire , quipping on June 26 that the outfit was “both a suit and not a suit.” This is not the first time Zelenskyy’s wardrobe has triggered a betting uproar on Polymarket. A similar dispute erupted in May over whether his outfit during a German meeting counted as a suit. That market ultimately ruled “no,” despite Derek Guy asserting the matching cloth made it technically a suit. zelenskyy wears a suit while visiting germany. this is, technically, a suit, as a suit is just a garment where the jacket and pants have been cut from the same cloth pic.twitter.com/CjLXTzMMaA — derek guy (@dieworkwear) May 29, 2025 The controversy highlights the subjective nature of Polymarket’s prediction markets, which rely on UMA Protocol’s blockchain-based oracles to verify outcomes. Critics say the system can be prone to manipulation or ambiguity. In March, a $7 million bet over a Ukraine mineral deal also sparked allegations of oracle issues, while a recent Truf.Network report warned the entire market risks collapse when data is unverifiable or manipulated. Adding context, Zelenskyy has previously said he will only wear a suit again when Ukraine’s war with Russia ends. Ukrainian outlet The Kyiv Independent reported his preference for military-style clothing as a symbol of ongoing resistance. Polymarket Nears Unicorn Status With $200M Raise As reported, Polymarket is close to securing a $200 million funding round led by Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund, valuing the crypto-based prediction platform at $1 billion. Despite being banned in the U.S. and raided by the FBI last year , Polymarket’s user base and market activity have surged, with over 21,000 open markets and $700 million in active trading volume. The platform recently partnered with Elon Musk’s X to integrate prediction markets with Grok, X’s AI chatbot, boosting its visibility amid ongoing regulatory hurdles. Polymarket has seen explosive growth since the 2024 U.S. election, hitting a $2.5 billion trading peak in November, but it remains restricted in several countries and faces criticism over potential market manipulation. The post Zelenskyy’s NATO Outfit Spurs $79M Betting Dispute on Polymarket appeared first on Cryptonews .

Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.