CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
America's Social Casino

crypto.news 2025-05-28 05:42:14

Ripple urges SEC clarity on digital asset and investment contract separation

Ripple has submitted an additional letter to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s Crypto Task Force, calling for clearer guidelines on when a digital asset stops being part of an investment contract. The letter , shared publicly by Ripple’s ( XRP ) chief legal officer Stuart Alderoty on May 28, responds to a key question raised by commissioner Hester Peirce in her recent “New Paradigm” speech: At what point does a crypto asset separate from an investment contract and cease to be treated as a security? Ripple pointed to existing legal analysis, particularly the 2022 paper titled The Ineluctable Modality of Securities Law. The paper argues that most fungible crypto assets traded on secondary markets are not securities, as they do not carry ongoing obligations between buyers and the original issuers. The company also cited the 2023 ruling in SEC vs. Ripple Labs, where the court found that XRP is not inherently a security , only some early institutional sales qualified as investment contracts. You might also like: Ripple CEO snubbed by Lummis: XRP FUD Fuels crypto drama In its letter, Ripple proposed a clear legal test. It suggests that a digital asset should be presumed separate from the investment contract unless two conditions are met. First, the issuer must have made material promises that remain unfulfilled, and second, the current holder has enforceable rights against the issuer. This would prevent regulators from targeting assets based solely on their origin and allow more legal certainty for market participants. “A sound safe harbor should operate within, not expand, the existing scope of federal securities law,” the letter emphasized, calling for clarity that protects good-faith actors without shielding bad ones. Ripple also criticized vague regulatory concepts like “sufficient decentralization,” calling instead for objective criteria like network maturity, public trading history, and a lack of unilateral control. The company maintained that new rules must be grounded in current law, not created through enforcement . The filing comes as Ripple and the SEC approach the final stages of a years-long legal battle. While a settlement proposal was denied by Judge Analisa Torres on May 15 due to procedural issues, both parties are expected to refile. Read more: Volatility Shares launches first XRP futures ETF on Nasdaq

면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.