Home Fear & Greed Pools Wallets Dictionary Advertise Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Market Cap:
24h Vol:
Cryptocurrencies: 11975
Markets: 92589
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
A company that is changing the way the world mines bitcoin

WallStreet Forex Robot 3.0
Market Cap
24h Vol
11975
Cryptocurrencies
54.28%
Bitcoin Share
coinpedia 2024-12-10 08:18:23

XRP Lawsuit: Experts Fear Crenshaw’s Return to SEC Could Tip the Scales Against Ripple

XRP Lawsuit: Experts Fear Crenshaw’s Return to SEC Could Tip the Scales Against Ripple

The post XRP Lawsuit: Experts Fear Crenshaw’s Return to SEC Could Tip the Scales Against Ripple appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Senate Democrats are aiming to fast-track the reconfirmation of SEC Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw this week, but experts and industry advocates are urging the Senate Banking Committee to reconsider. Many argue that Crenshaw, who has been a staunch ally of anti-crypto SEC Chair Gary Gensler, should not be re-nominated due to her track record of opposing pro-crypto policies. Fox Business journalist Eleanor Terrett reported that the Senate Banking Committee is scheduled to vote next Wednesday on Crenshaw’s re-nomination. If confirmed, she would remain on the SEC until 2029. If the Senate does not approve her reappointment, President Trump would have the opportunity to nominate a new candidate. Gemini’s Tyler Winklevoss wrote, “The Senate Banking Committee should not re-nominate SEC Commissioner Crenshaw. The American people voted overwhelming for change at the SEC, not for more anti-crypto decels. Senators should respect and honor this mandate.” NEW: The Senate Banking Committee will meet next Wednesday to vote on the re-nomination of Democrat @SECGov Commissioner Caroline Crenshaw. If the Senate votes her through, she’ll be able to serve on the commission until 2029. If she’s not confirmed, Trump will be able to… pic.twitter.com/LpdDQNNBc9 — Eleanor Terrett (@EleanorTerrett) December 6, 2024 Crenshaw, who has been a vocal proponent of Gensler’s more restrictive policies, has also pushed for more stringent climate reporting mandates. Interestingly, she voted against the approval of Bitcoin spot ETFs, even when Gensler showed support. This decision was controversial, especially after a federal circuit court ruled that approving such ETFs was required by law. Critics, including lawyer Jake Chervinsky, have argued that Crenshaw represents an anti-innovation stance that risks alienating voters in the upcoming 2024 elections. Chervinsky called her stance a “huge mistake” and suggested it would not resonate well with the public. He further pointed out that Crenshaw is even more adversarial to crypto than Gensler, citing her dissent against the spot bitcoin ETF approval as a prime example of her anti-crypto position. He wrote, “Her claim to crypto fame was writing a dissent opposing approval of the spot bitcoin ETF, even when Gensler was in favor, and even though a federal circuit court basically said it was required by law.”

Most Read News



Cryptohopper
hardware wallets, hardware , wallets, Crypto Currency, Cryptocurrency hardware wallets, Crypto Apparal, crypto wallet, Cryptocurrency wallets

Market Cap
24h Vol
54.28%
Bitcoin Share
0
Today News
Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.