Home Fear & Greed Pools Wallets Dictionary Advertise Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Market Cap:
24h Vol:
Cryptocurrencies: 12450
Markets: 96130
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
A company that is changing the way the world mines bitcoin

WallStreet Forex Robot 3.0
Market Cap
24h Vol
12450
Cryptocurrencies
55.82%
Bitcoin Share
The Coin Rise 2025-01-27 13:05:14

Judge Partially Backs SEC in Kraken Case, Rejects Major Questions Defense

Judge Partially Backs SEC in Kraken Case, Rejects Major Questions Defense

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) scored a partial legal victory in its case against crypto exchange Kraken, with a federal judge ruling to dismiss a key defense brought by the company. Recently, Judge William Orrick of California struck down Kraken’s argument that Congress hadn’t granted the SEC authority over cryptocurrency. SEC Gains Ground Against Kraken The dismissed argument, known as the “major questions doctrine,” asserts that regulatory agencies cannot exercise powers not explicitly granted by Congress. However, Judge Orrick determined that the SEC’s actions against Kraken did not overstep its delegated authority. He emphasized that while cryptocurrency is a growing sector, it hasn’t reached a level of economic significance comparable to other major industries regulated under this doctrine, such as energy markets or student loan debt. This decision comes as part of the SEC’s lawsuit against Kraken, filed in November 2023. The regulator claims that Kraken has been offering unregistered securities through its platform since 2018, in violation of U.S. securities laws. Fair Notice Defense Still Stands While the court rejected Kraken’s major questions defense, Judge Orrick allowed another critical argument to remain. Kraken had argued it lacked “fair notice” from the SEC about its alleged legal violations. The judge acknowledged that Kraken had plausibly claimed the SEC failed to adequately clarify how existing legal frameworks, such as the Howey Test, applied to the exchange’s activities. The Howey Test determines whether certain transactions qualify as investment contracts, thereby subjecting them to securities regulations. According to Judge Orrick, the SEC has yet to demonstrate that any entity in Kraken’s position would have reasonably understood their transactions to fall under this classification. The fair notice defense, which invokes due process rights, could potentially serve as a pivotal point in Kraken’s ongoing legal battle with the SEC . Broader Implications for the Crypto Industry Kraken is one of several cryptocurrency exchanges currently under scrutiny by the SEC. The regulator has initiated similar lawsuits against other major players, including Binance , and Ripple, as part of its broader push to establish a regulatory framework for digital assets. To navigate these complexities, the SEC has established a specialized crypto task force, led by Commissioner Hester Peirce, known for her crypto-friendly stance . This move signals the agency’s intent to regulate the evolving crypto landscape while clarifying its legal boundaries. The post Judge Partially Backs SEC in Kraken Case, Rejects Major Questions Defense appeared first on TheCoinrise.com .

Most Read News



Cryptohopper
Market Cap
24h Vol
55.82%
Bitcoin Share
0
Today News
Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.