Home Fear & Greed Pools Wallets Dictionary Advertise Facebook Twitter Telegram Reddit Youtube
Market Cap:
24h Vol:
Cryptocurrencies: 12837
Markets: 99741
CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
ENG
EST
RUS
TUR
DEU
CHI
KOR
ITA
USD
USD
AED
AFN
ALL
AMD
ANG
AOA
ARS
AUD
AWG
AZN
BAM
BBD
BDT
BGN
BHD
BIF
BMD
BND
BOB
BRL
BTN
BWP
BYN
BZD
CAD
CDF
CHF
CLF
CLP
CNH
CNY
COP
CRC
CUC
CUP
CVE
CZK
DJF
DKK
DOP
DZD
EGP
ERN
ETB
EUR
FJD
FKP
GBP
GEL
GHS
GIP
GMD
GNF
GTQ
GYD
HKD
HNL
HRK
HTG
HUF
IDR
ILS
IMP
INR
ISK
JMD
JOD
JPY
KES
KGS
KHR
KMF
KPW
KRW
KWD
KYD
KZT
LAK
LBP
LKR
LRD
LSL
LYD
MAD
MDL
MGA
MKD
MMK
MNT
MOP
MRU
MUR
MVR
MWK
MXN
MYR
MZN
NAD
NGN
NIO
NOK
NPR
NZD
OMR
PAB
PEN
PGK
PHP
PKR
PLN
PYG
QAR
RON
RSD
RUB
RWF
SAR
SBD
SCR
SDG
SEK
SGD
SHP
SLL
SRD
SSP
STD
STN
SVC
SYP
SZL
THB
TJS
TMT
TND
TOP
TRY
TTD
TWD
TZS
UAH
UGX
UYU
UZS
VES
VND
VUV
WST
ZAR
ZMW
ZWL
A company that is changing the way the world mines bitcoin

WallStreet Forex Robot 3.0
Market Cap
24h Vol
12837
Cryptocurrencies
60.66%
Bitcoin Share
coinpedia 2025-02-17 08:56:32

LIBRA Meme Coin Exposed As Insider Secret Ties to MELANIA Token

LIBRA Meme Coin Exposed As Insider Secret Ties to MELANIA Token

The post LIBRA Meme Coin Exposed As Insider Secret Ties to MELANIA Token appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News The LIBRA meme coin has recently made headlines, but not for the reasons its investors might have hoped. A new investigation by blockchain analysts at Bubblemaps has uncovered a web of suspicious connections between LIBRA and MELANIA, another controversial token. The findings suggest that the same insiders who profited millions from MELANIA may be the same insiders behind the LIBRA crash , as well, as raising concerns about yet another pump-and-dump scheme in the crypto space. Another Classic Pump-and-Dump According to analysts, the same insiders who controlled MELANIA also launched LIBRA, running the same shady tactics. It all began when an address, P5tb4, made over $2.4 million on MELANIA. https://twitter.com/bubblemaps/status/1891289507338580028 But what raised eyebrows was where the profits were sent next, a wallet labeled 0xcEA, which is directly tied to MELANIA’s creator. Even more concerning, the transactions were carried out through USDC’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol (CCTP), making it harder to track the movement of funds at first glance. But it gets worse. 0xcEA was also found funding the creator of LIBRA, known as DEfcyK, the same entity that cashed out a staggering $87 million before the token’s inevitable collapse. Just like MELANIA, the launch of LIBRA was manipulated, with insiders sniping the token early and extracting millions before retail investors could react. Web of Manipulated Tokens The evidence doesn’t stop with LIBRA and MELANIA. The same address has been linked to multiple other pump-and-dump tokens, including TRUST, KACY, VIBES, and HOOD. This isn’t just one-off exploitation, it’s a systematic strategy of launching, pumping, and dumping tokens while leaving retail investors in the dust. Further analysis revealed that 0xcEA was also involved in sniping LIBRA early, profiting an additional $6 million using multiple wallets to hide the activity. Who’s Responsible Behind These? After LIBRA’s collapse, the controversy took a political turn when Argentine President Javier Milei , who had been linked to the LIBRA project, publicly denied any involvement. Following LIBRA’s dramatic price crash, Milei called for an investigation into potential market manipulation. Some critics even suggested that he should face impeachment over his alleged ties to the scandal. Meanwhile, KIP Protocol and Kelsier Ventures, both linked to LIBRA’s launch, are blaming each other for the token’s failure. KIP’s CEO, Julian Peh, claims they had no control over LIBRA’s launch and that Kelsier, the market maker, should be held responsible.

Most Read News



Cryptohopper
Market Cap
24h Vol
60.66%
Bitcoin Share
322
Today News
Read the Disclaimer : All content provided herein our website, hyperlinked sites, associated applications, forums, blogs, social media accounts and other platforms (“Site”) is for your general information only, procured from third party sources. We make no warranties of any kind in relation to our content, including but not limited to accuracy and updatedness. No part of the content that we provide constitutes financial advice, legal advice or any other form of advice meant for your specific reliance for any purpose. Any use or reliance on our content is solely at your own risk and discretion. You should conduct your own research, review, analyse and verify our content before relying on them. Trading is a highly risky activity that can lead to major losses, please therefore consult your financial advisor before making any decision. No content on our Site is meant to be a solicitation or offer.