CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
America's Social Casino

TimesTabloid 2025-06-18 07:04:03

Ripple (XRP) vs SEC: Legal Expert Bill Morgan Summarizes the Whole Settlement Process

The high-stakes legal battle between Ripple and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has now entered its settlement phase. Legal expert Bill Morgan has mapped out the process with clarity, outlining the steps that have already been completed, those that are in motion, and what remains before the final resolution. Settlement Signed and Legal Pause Granted The breakthrough came when both parties finalized and signed a settlement agreement—Ripple on April 23, 2025, and the SEC on May 8. Just before the SEC’s signature, both sides jointly asked the U.S. Court of Appeals to pause the ongoing appeal and cross-appeal . That request was granted, putting the proceedings on hold for 60 days—from April 16 to June 16—while the parties pursued relief from the district court. SEC v Ripple: How the settlement process is going 1. Settlement agreement signed by Ripple parties on April 23, 2025 and by the SEC on May 8, 2025 . 2. Parties filed a motion to hold the appeal and cross appeal in abeyance and obtained 60 days abeyance from April 16, 2025 to… — bill morgan (@Belisarius2020) June 18, 2025 First Procedural Misstep On May 8, both parties filed a motion under Rule 62.1 with Judge Analisa Torres , requesting an indicative ruling. This is a required step when a case is on appeal, and the parties want the district court to signal its willingness to revisit the judgment. However, Judge Torres denied the motion , not because of the content, but due to a procedural oversight: the motion failed to cite Rule 60(b), the correct legal basis for seeking relief from a final judgment. As Bill Morgan explained, “The motion wasn’t rejected on substance. It failed because it didn’t refer to Rule 60. That’s now been fixed.” Second Motion Filed Correctly On June 12, Ripple and the SEC filed a revised joint motion , this time correctly invoking Rule 60(b). The new motion again sought an indicative ruling, this time properly framed to allow the court to consider modifying the judgment if the appellate court remands the case. On June 16, the SEC updated the Court of Appeals on the revised filing and requested that the current abeyance period continue while Judge Torres considers the new motion. We are on twitter, follow us to connect with us :- @TimesTabloid1 — TimesTabloid (@TimesTabloid1) July 15, 2023 Awaiting Judge Torres’ Ruling At present, the parties await Judge Torres’ decision on the second joint motion. If she grants the indicative ruling, it would allow the parties to request a limited remand from the Court of Appeals so they can return to her court to implement the settlement. Morgan noted, “There’s no disagreement between the parties now. The remaining steps hinge entirely on procedural clearance from the courts.” Limited Remand and District Court Relief Should the Court of Appeals approve the remand request, the parties will reappear before Judge Torres to formally seek the agreed relief. This would involve dissolving the injunction that has long restricted Ripple’s operations and initiating the payment of the negotiated $50 million penalty. Final Closure: Dismissal of Appeals With the relief granted and settlement executed, Ripple and the SEC would then file a final joint motion with the Second Circuit to dismiss both the appeal and cross-appeal. That motion would officially close one of the most significant enforcement cases in crypto history. Thanks to Bill Morgan’s detailed breakdown, the XRP community has a precise view of the path forward. The next move belongs to Judge Torres, but with all key filings completed, the finish line is finally in sight. Disclaimer : This content is meant to inform and should not be considered financial advice. The views expressed in this article may include the author’s personal opinions and do not represent Times Tabloid’s opinion. Readers are urged to do in-depth research before making any investment decisions. Any action taken by the reader is strictly at their own risk. Times Tabloid is not responsible for any financial losses. Follow us on Twitter , Facebook , Telegram , and Google News The post Ripple (XRP) vs SEC: Legal Expert Bill Morgan Summarizes the Whole Settlement Process appeared first on Times Tabloid .

면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.