CoinInsight360.com logo CoinInsight360.com logo
America's Social Casino

coinpedia 2025-06-27 04:51:12

Why Judge Torres Said No to Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit Settlement

The post Why Judge Torres Said No to Ripple vs SEC Lawsuit Settlement appeared first on Coinpedia Fintech News Judge Analisa Torres has denied a joint motion filed by Ripple and the SEC — a move that’s now triggering deep conversations across the XRP community. Despite both parties seemingly on the same page for once, the court made it clear—there are no shortcuts when it comes to justice. Let’s break down what happened and why the judge blocked their attempt to move forward quietly. Ripple SEC Joint Motion Denied Ripple and the SEC, who have battled in court for years over XRP’s legal status, recently teamed up to ask Judge Torres to approve two key changes to their case: first remove the long-standing injunction, and second reduce Ripple’s penalty from $125 million down to $50 million. While the request came as a surprise to many, it was seen as a joint attempt to wrap things up early and cleanly. However, the judge wasn’t on board. She denied the request, stating that she cannot comment on or undo any part of the final judgment while the appeal is still active In essence, she made it clear, “You don’t get to erase a final judgment just because you’re now friends.” The ask was BIG: Cancel the permanent injunction Cut Ripple’s $125 million penalty by more than 60% Yes, Ripple and the SEC — two courtroom adversaries — came to the judge with a handshake and a proposal. But Judge Torres said: “You don’t get to erase a final… — John Squire (@TheCryptoSquire) June 26, 2025 Why Judge Torres Said No Ripple and the SEC tried using a rarely granted legal option under Rule 60(b)(6) , which allows for changes to a final judgment in extraordinary cases. But Judge Torres rejected this, pointing to Ripple’s earlier behavior—deliberate violations of securities laws, continued misconduct, and a lack of accountability. In her words, Ripple had shown no convincing sign of changing, and the existing injunction was still necessary to protect investors. She made it clear, no shortcuts will be allowed while the case is still on appeal. Quoting a past U.S. Supreme Court decision, Judge Torres reminded both parties that a final court ruling belongs to the legal system, not just those involved. Courts are not tools for convenience, and legal decisions cannot be quietly erased even when both sides want to move on. Speculation Over Ripple SEC Allies? XRP supporters raise a bigger question: Why did Ripple and the SEC suddenly act like allies? Some believe both parties are preparing for something bigger—possibly a major shift in how digital assets will be used globally. With stablecoins launching, central bank digital currencies emerging, and even XRP ETF applications underway in Canada and Asia, the timing of this legal pushback feels significant. With the motion denied, the judge’s message is clear: settlements must happen in the open, and legal shortcuts won’t be tolerated.

면책 조항 읽기 : 본 웹 사이트, 하이퍼 링크 사이트, 관련 응용 프로그램, 포럼, 블로그, 소셜 미디어 계정 및 기타 플랫폼 (이하 "사이트")에 제공된 모든 콘텐츠는 제 3 자 출처에서 구입 한 일반적인 정보 용입니다. 우리는 정확성과 업데이트 성을 포함하여 우리의 콘텐츠와 관련하여 어떠한 종류의 보증도하지 않습니다. 우리가 제공하는 컨텐츠의 어떤 부분도 금융 조언, 법률 자문 또는 기타 용도에 대한 귀하의 특정 신뢰를위한 다른 형태의 조언을 구성하지 않습니다. 당사 콘텐츠의 사용 또는 의존은 전적으로 귀하의 책임과 재량에 달려 있습니다. 당신은 그들에게 의존하기 전에 우리 자신의 연구를 수행하고, 검토하고, 분석하고, 검증해야합니다. 거래는 큰 손실로 이어질 수있는 매우 위험한 활동이므로 결정을 내리기 전에 재무 고문에게 문의하십시오. 본 사이트의 어떠한 콘텐츠도 모집 또는 제공을 목적으로하지 않습니다.